In
recent weeks, Syria has been a big topic in the United States. Syria has agreed to a Russian proposal to give up their chemical weapons. President Barack Obama tells people to remain cautious; however it is unclear how the deal will pan out. The al-Assad regime has agreed to give up the chemical weapons but it does not mean that America should not step in.
Following
reports that the al-Assad government used chemical weapons to kill 1,300
people, including many women and children, President Barack Obama called for military
action. President Obama called chemical weapons a "red line" that
cannot be crossed. In a recent address to the nation, President Obama credited
the use of chemical weapons as the reason for a potential strike.
Many
people in the United States, however, are opposed to idea of engaging in
another Middle Eastern war. People are opposed because the U.S. is just winding
down from their own involvement with the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Even
though the Obama administration has said that the maximum time frame for a
campaign would be 90 days, people are wary because President Bush deployed
troops to Iraq to find chemical weapons. And still almost 12 years later, the
United States is still engaged in war in the Middle East.
A
potential problem with U.S. involvement, however, is that Syria has a very good
relationship with Russia. This could complicate things because if the United
States were to respond to the al-Assad regime with military action, then there
is a possibility that Russia could retaliate. If that happens then the whole
conflict could be significantly worsened.
Many
citizens are also wondering why the U.S. is trying to get involved now. The
Syrian civil war has been going on for two years and the conflict has claimed
more than 100,000 lives, many of those women and children. Why doesn't the use
of conventional weapons warrant military action?
Whatever
the answer to that question is, the fact remains that innocent people are still
dying and no one is stepping in to help them.
Although
there is a strong anti-war argument, there are also many reasons why we should
get involved. For one, the use of chemical weapons warrants a military strike.
Considering that the British Parliament recently voted against possible
military action in Syria, Obama believes that it is the U.S.’s responsibility
to intervene. The United States has always been the country that stands up for
the littler countries. Since the Syrian people cannot defend themselves against
their government, some else has to step in to help.
The
United States needs to step up and be a country that others can model
themselves after. If America deploys troops to Syria then other countries might
follow.
But
although arguments on both sides are strong, it looks as though a military
strike as been averted, at least for the near future.
By: Alden Bedsole